Compare/ Contrast Han China Mauryan/ Gupta India Essay

Compare/ Contrast Essay Intro: 1. Broad Analytical Statement: Almost all successful classical civilizations needed a strong political base in order to thrive. 2. Thesis: Although both Han China and Gupta India’s political control directly correlated to religion, they differed in the centralization of their government, and what members of society became rulers. 3. a) Religion – Han China’s political system was directly influenced by Confucianism, and India’s political system correlated with Hinduism b) Economic – China’s isolation led to them having a localized government. On the other hand, India was susceptible to outside forces and influences, causing it to have more diverse culture, and therefore to have local†¦show more content†¦4. Contrast – China’s centralized and unified government allowed them to become a stronger civilization. Mauryan/ Gupta India wasn’t as strong of a civilization, due to their lack in unification in both politics and culture. 5. Evidence – Since China was overall more unified than India, many of the systems and beliefs they had and practiced during Classical times are still intact today. Also, although the Han dynasty came to an end, the existing culture remained in place with little change during the years and years to come. India was constantly changing during the next time period. Only certain things, such as Hindu practices, still exist in India today. Paragraph 4: 1. Topic – Lastly, Han and India differed in the way a person was a leader and who could assume that role. 2. Contrast – In China, the Han rulers and people with the most power were the educated bureaucrats. India’s rulers were part of the ruling family who were leaders of the empire. 3. Evidence – (China) These people were elite members of society. To become involved in politics or to be any leader, a person had to take a test of intelligence, based off Confucian teachings and beliefs. (India) In society, Brahmins (priests) were held in the highest regard. Whatever caste a person was born into, that is where the person stayed, and that’s what determined the person’s importance. 4. Contrast – Han China was ruled in dynastic cycles while India was ruled in empires. 5.Show MoreRelatedHistory Essay3334 Words   |  14 Pagesdifferences in methods of political control in TWO of the following empires in the Classical period. †¢ Han China (206 B.C.E.–220 C.E.) †¢ Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B.C.E.–550 C.E.) †¢ Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.–476 C.E.) Revised Question Analyze similarities and differences in techniques of imperial administration in TWO of the following empires. †¢ Han China (206 B.C.E.–220 C.E.) †¢ Mauryan/Gupta India (320 B.C.E.–550 C.E.) †¢ Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.–476 C.E.) Rationale for Revision: By changing the